It is a contention of this author that in order to plumb the actual proclivities of our congressman, it is necessary to look beyond the main votes and look at what happens in the arcane parliamentary procedure that precedes the main vote. Consistency of thought and action is a very powerful measure of the true intents of an individual.

Mr. McHugh has strong union backing even though in the past he as only voted 40% of the time with the interests of organized labor. This past Friday he voted for HR 800, the Employee Free Choice Act of 2007 that will authorize the creation of a union by merely gaining a majority of employees to sign “cards” – essentially a petition – to form a union. This will all be done out in the open without the mandate for a secret ballot.

It is therefore notable that before Mr. McHugh voted for the bill, he voted against it and by doing so tried to hand control of the debate over to those that vehemently oppose the bill. As noted before in these essays, voting against Ordering the Previous Question when voting on a Rule does just that. Mr. McHugh, as he so often does – being true to form – voted against Ordering the Previous Question (the vote to vote) and thus, buried in the arcane parliamentary procedure of the House, did all he could to obstruct the bill.

Then just before the final vote on passage of the bill, he voted to recommit the bill with the addition that only US citizens or legal aliens can participate in the union petition. The problem is that employees by law are supposed to have been checked by the employer to be legal residents. The clear intention of this tactic was to weaken the bill so that it would be unworkable. It would allow an unscrupulous employer who hires illegals to then turn around and challenge the attempts at union organization. It never ceases to amaze me how deviously clever they are. Give with one hand and take away with another. Reminds me of how the NSA Director (played by Richard Jordan) in Clancy’s Hunt for Red October characterized himself: “I’m a politician…when I’m not kissing babies, I’m stealing their lollipops.”

To those of us that see this bill as an equalizer of power between employer and employee, the vote can only be considered well cast. However, Mr. McHugh has a major problem. He has now betrayed his Republican base throughout the district. It has not gone unnoticed that John Johnson’s very Republican Watertown Times – but avid supporter of Mr. McHugh – has not reported this vote. His ability to win election after election is dependent upon both the support of that base and the support of organized labor. He has successfully, election after election, been able to raid his Democratic opponent’s base by courting organized labor.

No doubt, whoever runs again him will face the same problem. Even though this bill is doomed in the Senate, organized labor again will support him with money and organizational skill. All the while he has voted against our interests by continuing to support the war, by voting against stem cell research, voting for Medicare part D, voting to cut veteran benefits, avoiding the vote on negotiating drug prices with drug companies and on and on.

No one questions Mr. McHugh’s savvy ability as a politician. Whether it’s getting labor’s support by voting for a bill that he first tries to derail or casting selective ineffective votes for labor, it is the consistency and logic of his voting pattern that truly belies his real intents. When challenged about this vote by the Republican base, he can easily say that he did everything he could to stop it. He can please everyone.

Now that’s a politician.